OpenAI, which counts India as its second greatest market with hundreds of thousands of customers, is locked in an intense courtroom battle triggered by home information company ANI for alleged use of copyright content material.
The case gained prominence in latest weeks as guide publishers and media teams, together with these of billionaires Gautam Adani and Mukesh Ambani, banded collectively to oppose OpenAI within the case.
OpenAI, which is dealing with new challenges from Chinese startup DeepSeek’s breakthrough low cost AI computing, has maintained it builds its AI fashions utilizing public data according to honest use ideas. The firm faces related copyright infringement lawsuits in US, Germany and Canada.
Details of authorized rebuttals by OpenAI in different markets should not recognized, however in New Delhi it’s opposing ANI by saying in courtroom filings its utilization phrases name for dispute decision solely in San Francisco, it’s past the jurisdiction of Indian courts and it “doesn’t preserve any servers or knowledge centres” within the nation.
“It’s a pre-Internet period argument which won’t fly in Indian courts at present,” mentioned Dharmendra Chatur, a companion at Poovayya & Co., which advises overseas tech corporations.Â
“Google, X, Facebook all carry out companies by means of their overseas corporations and are celebration to litigation throughout India,” Chatur added, explaining courts usually assess if a web site is accessible and presents companies to prospects in India in deciding the purpose.
OpenAI didn’t reply to Reuters queries for this text. Its lawyer in India, Amit Sibal, declined to remark, citing ongoing proceedings.
Six different legal professionals, and submissions of two court-appointed consultants within the OpenAI lawsuit, Arul George Scaria and Adarsh Ramanujan, mentioned Indian judges can hear the matter.
“It is obvious that OpenAI is making their interactive companies obtainable to the customers in India,” Scaria wrote in his Jan. 25 courtroom submission, which has not been made public however was seen by Reuters.
OpenAI’s web site exhibits it fees an 18%Â Indian tax on paid choices and it mentioned not too long ago there was a “huge uptake of ChatGPT” within the crucial market.
In the OpenAI-ANI case, an outright win on the jurisdiction argument will imply OpenAI won’t have to face the copyright lawsuit in India. If it loses that argument, it must contest ANI’s demand for deletion of coaching knowledge and pay $230,000 (roughly Rs. 2 crore) in damages.
The Delhi courtroom is about to listen to the case subsequent in February on the jurisdiction and different arguments.
Asked concerning the lawsuit, Reuters, which holds a 26 % curiosity in ANI, has mentioned it isn’t concerned in its enterprise practices or operations.
Foreign DefendantÂ
Batting for the facility of Indian courts, legal professionals and the court-appointed skilled Scaria cited a 2022 determination involving Telegram as a authorized precedent.
An Indian creator had sued Telegram for her leaked copyright works showing on Telegram teams, however the firm declined to share particulars saying it was ruled by legal guidelines in Dubai, the place it’s primarily based, and had servers outdoors India.
Telegram disclosed the main points after a Delhi decide dominated: “the standard ideas of territoriality now not exist … (Telegram selecting) to not find its servers in India can not divest the Indian courts from coping with copyright disputes.”
The courtroom didn’t impose a penalty.
OpenAI, nevertheless, argues there may be 2009 courtroom precedent in India that says merely as a result of an app or webpage is accessible there doesn’t imply judges can get jurisdiction “over a overseas defendant.”Â
Even if OpenAI’s argument on jurisdiction fails to cease the lawsuit initially, an Indian mental property lawyer mentioned it might later assist the corporate make the purpose {that a} courtroom order would want enforcement overseas. The lawyer declined to be named due to the matter’s sensitivity.
Though Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s authorities shouldn’t be celebration to the OpenAI lawsuit, it has had a love-hate relationship with Big Tech.
India’s IT minister in 2021 referred to US tech corporations and mentioned their “place that ‘I’ll solely be ruled by legal guidelines of America’ … is plainly not acceptable.”
In probably the most bitter public faceoff that very same yr, Twitter, now X, declined to adjust to orders to take away sure content material and the federal government issued a press launch, titled “Twitter must adjust to the legal guidelines of the land”.
The firm complied later however sued New Delhi. The case is ongoing.
Even earlier than Indian authorized challenges mounted, OpenAI chief Sam Altman deliberate an India go to for February 5. An electronic mail exhibits two different senior executives, James Hairston and Srinivas Narayanan, additionally plan to be in India.
“India is basically vital … we have seen huge uptake of ChatGPT,” OpenAI India government, Pragya Misra, mentioned final yr.
© Thomson Reuters 2025
(This story has not been edited by NDTV workers and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
