Home Gaming Square Enix accused of abusing copyright regulation to silence fan criticism

Square Enix accused of abusing copyright regulation to silence fan criticism

8
0


Life Is Strange: Double Exposure screenshot of Max Caulfield next to a reddit takedown notice
Max takedown (Square Enix)

The makers of Life is Strange: Double Exposure are accused by followers of utilizing authorized takedowns to restrict dialogue and criticism of the sport.

What does a distinct segment lesbian online game subreddit should do with the way forward for freedom of expression on the web? Quite rather a lot, because it seems.

I’ve been trying into regarding allegations that counsel Square Enix has been abusing copyright takedown powers to focus on and shut down criticism from followers of their new sport, Life is Strange: Double Exposure.

The subreddit r/pricefield is a group devoted to the Life Is Strange franchise, primarily delivery the lead character of Max together with her love curiosity Chloe from the primary sport. It has 12,000 members, a lot of whom have engaged in discussions vital of the choice to omit Chloe from Double Exposure.

The subreddit is an unbiased area for Life is Strange followers to speak fan theories, share fan artwork and talk about the video games, and is wholly unaffiliated from Square Enix. These followers seen that increasingly of their posts and feedback had been being taken down by Reddit, after a 3rd occasion started issuing copyright violations.

In response, and fearing that they risked additional penalties from Reddit, moderators of the subreddit revealed an open letter to Square Enix, stating that they imagine somebody on the firm, or developer Deck Nine, was ‘wilfully eradicating non-infringing content material for causes aside from infringement’. They imagine that is taking place as a result of Square Enix is sad with not having editorial management over the web page.

Takedowns on the subreddit, they are saying, seem to have included textual content posts containing publicly accessible info, together with dialogue of public tweets made by the sport’s builders. Many followers in the community are fearful that it is a focused and hostile transfer to close down honest and cheap criticism of the brand new sport.

Chloe in the original Life Is Strange
Chloe within the authentic Life Is Strange (Square Enix)

‘It’s been each deeply saddening and extremely irritating to see how Deck Nine and Square Enix have handled us – one of the enthusiastic and outspoken offshoots of the fandom,’ moderator HoHoey informed GameCentral.

‘Not solely are they making an attempt to silence real criticism and snuff out the voices of rightfully disgruntled followers, they’re additionally making makes an attempt at intimidating members of the group with DMCA takedown notices and abusing copyright regulation to manage the attain of publicly accessible info.

‘At the top of the day, we’re only a bunch of Life Is Strange followers making an attempt to rejoice and revel in two of probably the most beloved characters within the franchise.’

If a writer is deciding to make use of their powers to close down public discussion board discussions, it could set a worrying precedent that corporations can merely block and take away conversations between web customers that they don’t like.

What’s so putting about this story is that the writer isn’t making an attempt to wreck management in opposition to ‘anti-woke’ web trolls on a campaign to ‘cancel’ the sport, that includes themes they don’t like, however slightly they appear to be concentrating on long-standing followers of the franchise.

The implications that this may have on the way forward for free expression on-line is regarding, however maybe symptomatic of a wider nervousness we’re seeing amongst online game publishers for the time being.

You solely have to take a look at the review-bombing of Dragon Age: The Veilguard on Metacritic in distinction to its ‘principally constructive’ critiques on Steam (the place you really should personal the sport to evaluate it) to see the ability on-line communities can command.

It’s clear that publishers face challenges on the subject of the ability of the web and the influence this may occasionally have on the success of their merchandise.

We spoke to Square Enix in regards to the allegations, and had been supplied with this official assertion:

‘In relation to DMCA notices, all steps taken had been in accordance with applicable authorized necessities and Reddit’s personal procedures for reporting mental property violations. These processes apply to infringing content material shared previous to a sport’s launch, together with leaks or confidential info because of breach of non-disclosure agreements and datamined content material. No DMCA notices had been despatched concerning any posts outdoors of those circumstances.’

We additionally reached out to Reddit for remark, and at time of publication are but to listen to again from them.

If you’ve skilled something just like this, please do get in contact.

Life Is Strange: Double Exposure screenshot
Square Enix are risking the Streisand impact (Square Enix)

Email gamecentral@metro.co.uk, depart a remark under, follow us on Twitter, and sign-up to our e-newsletter.

To submit Inbox letters and Reader’s Features extra simply, with out the necessity to ship an e mail, simply use our Submit Stuff web page right here.

For extra tales like this, examine our Gaming web page.





Leave a Reply